<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidscohen.wordpress.com/2008/04/11/i-couldnt-have-said-it-better-myself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidscohen.wordpress.com/2008/04/11/i-couldnt-have-said-it-better-myself/</link>
	<description>Context is everything</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Garbers</title>
		<link>http://davidscohen.wordpress.com/2008/04/11/i-couldnt-have-said-it-better-myself/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Garbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidscohen.wordpress.com/?p=91#comment-36</guid>
		<description>One of the hard things about articulating a strategy is having the courage to leave things out.  

Years ago I was involved in "crafting a mission statement". The negotiation / collaboration process resulted in *everybody's* ideas and needs being shoehorned into one long, over-general, contorted sentence. First, you really had to struggle to parse the thing, and second, it could have applied to nearly any technology company, failing to distinguish our unique value. It was full of things like "optimizing shareholder value through innovative, customer-focused solutions." Yeah, right... but what does the company *do*? And, almost as important, what do you *not* do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the hard things about articulating a strategy is having the courage to leave things out.  </p>
<p>Years ago I was involved in &#8220;crafting a mission statement&#8221;. The negotiation / collaboration process resulted in *everybody&#8217;s* ideas and needs being shoehorned into one long, over-general, contorted sentence. First, you really had to struggle to parse the thing, and second, it could have applied to nearly any technology company, failing to distinguish our unique value. It was full of things like &#8220;optimizing shareholder value through innovative, customer-focused solutions.&#8221; Yeah, right&#8230; but what does the company *do*? And, almost as important, what do you *not* do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
